<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cecil Times &#187; Town of Elkton</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ceciltimes.com/tag/town-of-elkton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ceciltimes.com</link>
	<description>News and Views for Cecil County and the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Hornberger Insults Cecil County Councilors Who Question Her Demands; Strongarm Tactics by Appointees Trigger Independence Moves by Council</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2021/10/hornberger-insults-cecil-county-councilors-who-question-her-demands-strongarm-tactics-by-appointees-trigger-independence-moves-by-council/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2021/10/hornberger-insults-cecil-county-councilors-who-question-her-demands-strongarm-tactics-by-appointees-trigger-independence-moves-by-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 21:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chesapeake city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Central Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheriff&#039;s Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danielle hornberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farmland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town of Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vincent SammonsClay Stubbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=5909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEWS ANALYSIS Cecil County Executive Danielle Hornberger has lobbed an insult-laden video attack on the County Council for daring to disagree with her on an Elkton town land annexation case, claiming in a fact-free screed that Councilors were “bought and paid for” by developers—despite the fact that most of the Councilors had minimal campaign donations of any kind while she accepted multiple large donations from real estate interests. In addition, Hornberger’s appointed county attorney—Lawrence Scott, an Annapolis political consultant and lobbyist who never appeared in any state courtroom or even entered written legal representation on behalf of a client, according to the state Courts database—has tried to bully the Council on several issues, including solar panel farm legislation and the annexation case. Scott even made up his own facts recently to rail against and try to block cameras on school buses to catch car drivers who illegally pass a bus. The cameras are provided at no charge by a private firm that will collect fines and split the revenues with the county schools. Scott claimed the Sheriff’s Office would have to hire several new deputies to review the videos. But the Council called Major George Stanko from the audience and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2021/10/hornberger-insults-cecil-county-councilors-who-question-her-demands-strongarm-tactics-by-appointees-trigger-independence-moves-by-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update 1: Elkton Sr. Housing Loses in Court, But Golden Parachute Firmly in Place</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2010/07/update-1-elkton-sr-housing-loses-in-court-but-golden-parachute-firmly-in-place/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2010/07/update-1-elkton-sr-housing-loses-in-court-but-golden-parachute-firmly-in-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingerman Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Baynes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town of Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.wordpress.com/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ELKTON&#8211; The Town of Elkton agreed Tuesday afternoon to settle a lawsuit brought by two citizens challenging the concessions made by the town to accomodate a proposed senior citizens housing project, after a Circuit Court judge refused the town&#8217;s motion to dismiss the case.      After the ruling by visiting judge Raymond E. Beck to let the case go forward, both sides hammered out an agreement under which the town conceded it lacked the proper legal authority under town ordinances last December when it granted concessions and waivers of fees to an unrelated property at 110 Collins Street, owned by Cecil Bank, and sought to transfer those waivers to the Elkton Senior Housing Project on High Street.  The town also agreed to pay $4,000 in legal bills incurred by the plaintiffs, Robert Litzenberg and James Nicholson.    In addition, the developer of the project,  the Ingerman Group, of New Jersey, agreed not to sue Litzenberg and Nicholson. Keith Baynes, the attorney representing Litzenberg and Nicholson, told the court that the developer had threatened to sue his clients for speaking out about and filing their lawsuit over the town&#8217;s handling of the project.    But evidence presented in court also showed that the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2010/07/update-1-elkton-sr-housing-loses-in-court-but-golden-parachute-firmly-in-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BULLETIN: Town of Elkton Settles Lawsuit after Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case Against Concessions on Elkton Senior Housing Project</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2010/07/bulletin-town-of-elkton-settles-lawsuit-after-judge-refuses-to-dismiss-case-against-concessions-on-elkton-senior-housing-project/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2010/07/bulletin-town-of-elkton-settles-lawsuit-after-judge-refuses-to-dismiss-case-against-concessions-on-elkton-senior-housing-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seniors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton Senior Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingerman Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingerman Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Baynes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town of Elkton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.wordpress.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ELKTON&#8211; The Town of Elkton agreed Tuesday afternoon to settle a lawsuit brought by two citizens challenging the concessions made by the town to accomodate a proposed senior citizens housing project, after a Circuit Court judge refused the town&#8217;s motion to dismiss the case.      After the ruling by visiting judge Raymond E. Beck to let the case go forward, both sides hammered out an agreement under which the town conceded it lacked the proper legal authority under town ordinances last December when it granted concessions and waivers of fees to an unrelated property at 110 Collins Street, owned by Cecil Bank, and sought to transfer those waivers to the Elkton Senior Housing Project on High Street.  The town also agreed to pay $4,000 in legal bills incurred by the plaintiffs, Robert Litzenberg and James Nicholson.    In addition, the developer of the project,  the Ingerman Group, of New Jersey, agreed not to sue Litzenberg and Nicholson. Keith Baynes, the attorney representing Litzenberg and Nicholson, told the court that the developer had threatened to sue his clients for speaking out about and filing their lawsuit over the town&#8217;s handling of the project.    But evidence presented in court also showed that the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2010/07/bulletin-town-of-elkton-settles-lawsuit-after-judge-refuses-to-dismiss-case-against-concessions-on-elkton-senior-housing-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
