<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cecil Times &#187; tarim moore</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ceciltimes.com/tag/tarim-moore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ceciltimes.com</link>
	<description>News and Views for Cecil County and the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Cecil County Charter Amendments: Voters OK Four Ballot Questions</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2014/11/cecil-county-charter-amendments-voters-ok-four-ballot-questions/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2014/11/cecil-county-charter-amendments-voters-ok-four-ballot-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 05:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil County council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil County Executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tarim moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=4170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cecil County voters, who overwhelmingly approved a shift to Charter government in 2010, decided by strong margins on Tuesday that they were willing to accept four Charter changes, including some that could shift greater powers to the County Executive in budget deliberations. While all four Charter amendments won strong support from voters who cast ballots on the questions, there were substantial numbers of voters who simply left those items blank, according to Election Board tallies. Such “undercounts” generally reflect voter uncertainty about the question’s implications so they do not register their viewpoint. In conversations with voters before and during Election Day, Cecil Times found much confusion on the ballot questions, including some voters who believed they were re-affirming support for Charter government in general if they endorsed the four amendments on the ballot. QUESTION A: Voters approved this question by a tally of 88 percent, while 11.9 percent voted no. On Question A, voters were asked to give the County Executive an extra month to prepare her budget, submitting it to the County Council by April 1 each year instead of the current March 1. County Executive Tari Moore said she sought the extra time as a more efficient way [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2014/11/cecil-county-charter-amendments-voters-ok-four-ballot-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cecil County Council: Sewer Solstice, Deja vu Do-overs; DPW Chief, Broomell Encore Past Debate</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 01:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Hodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deja vu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Public Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diana Broomell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joyce Bowlsbey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Flanigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seneca Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tarim moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elsewhere it might be close to the summer solstice, but in Elkton, it was the Cecil County Council’s sewer solstice&#8211; as members danced around the fiscal and political bonfires of boosting sewer fees to reflect actual costs of services and future economic development implications of decisions made now. If you thought such decisions had actually been made in the county’s Fiscal 2014 budget adopted by the Council in May&#8211; one of the few major decisions made by the County Council to alter the County Executive’s budget—well, this is the land of the do-over. The issue came back on the legislative stage for an encore performance on Tuesday. It was yet another do-over—of the sort that plagued the old County Commissioners form of government in the past—but this time the architects of the do-over were the new ruling majority of the County Council. That majority—consisting of Council President Robert Hodge (R-5) and Councilors Alan McCarthy (R-1) and Joyce Bowlsbey (R-2)&#8211; recently voted to delay their previous budget decision to boost sewer hook-up fees for new developments&#8211; from $8,000 per living unit to $12,000&#8211; from the budget-approved effective date of 7/1/13 to 10/2/13. One of the boldest initiatives of new County Executive [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
