<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cecil Times &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ceciltimes.com/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ceciltimes.com</link>
	<description>News and Views for Cecil County and the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Court Decision Cuts Cecil County Future Tax Revenues $1.3 Million a Year; County Council Slogs Through Budget for Spending Cuts</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2015/05/court-decision-cuts-cecil-county-future-income-tax-revenues-1-3-million-a-year-county-council-slogs-through-budget-for-spending-cuts/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2015/05/court-decision-cuts-cecil-county-future-income-tax-revenues-1-3-million-a-year-county-council-slogs-through-budget-for-spending-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 16:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comptroller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Schneckenburger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Patchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Allison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joyce Bowlsbey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Franchot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Hodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tari Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston Robinson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=4436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new US Supreme Court decision will cost Cecil County an estimated $1.3 million a year in future lost income tax revenues, and refunds for past taxes struck down by the court could cost the county up to $1.4 million more than previously expected. The fiscal bad news came as the Cecil County Council continued its long march through the minutiae of the $184.7 million Fiscal 2016 operating budget proposed by County Executive Tari Moore in April. The Council members have been going line-by-line, with virtually no amount too small to be questioned by the councilors, who have demanded detailed answers from county department heads and top administration officials. At times there have been testy exchanges between Council members and county employees, while Moore has been above the fray—she is reported to be out of the country on vacation. The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Maryland had improperly imposed the “piggyback” income tax, which is collected by the state but turned over to the 23 counties and Baltimore City, on income earned in other states. The state’s own income tax system allowed credits to offset taxes paid to other states by a citizen or business, but the credits were not [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2015/05/court-decision-cuts-cecil-county-future-income-tax-revenues-1-3-million-a-year-county-council-slogs-through-budget-for-spending-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Same-Sex Fed Marriage Rights Ruling has Little Impact on Cecil County Govt.; Legally Wed Folks Now Get Benefits</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/06/supreme-court-ruling-on-fed-limits-on-same-sex-marriage-rights-has-little-impact-on-cecil-county-govt-legally-wed-couples-now-get-benefits/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/06/supreme-court-ruling-on-fed-limits-on-same-sex-marriage-rights-has-little-impact-on-cecil-county-govt-legally-wed-couples-now-get-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin O'Malley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donna Nichols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doug gansler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A landmark Supreme Court ruling on Wednesday, finding that same-sex legally married couples must have equal rights to benefits under federal law, is expected to have little impact on Cecil County government employees, who already have spousal benefits, a county official said. Donna Nichols, Cecil County’s Director of Human Resources, told Cecil Times that she had followed the breaking news of the Supreme Court decision on Wednesday and that the early indications were that little would change in county policy regarding employee benefits as a result of the ruling. For the past several years, all legally married employees—regardless of the gender of their spouses—have had access to health benefits, she said. However, she said that other issues—such as requirements under the separate federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) might have to be re-evaluated and revised in light of the new high court decision. The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional because it violated basic rights and equal protections under the law, and had improperly written “inequality” into federal law. As a result, benefits and legal rights provided under federal law will now be equally applied to legally married same-sex couples. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/06/supreme-court-ruling-on-fed-limits-on-same-sex-marriage-rights-has-little-impact-on-cecil-county-govt-legally-wed-couples-now-get-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
