<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cecil Times &#187; fund balance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ceciltimes.com/tag/fund-balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ceciltimes.com</link>
	<description>News and Views for Cecil County and the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Cecil County Council Strikes Out on Ethics Panel, Bond Bill and New $2.1 Million Reserve Funds Raid; Hornberger Throws Spitballs</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2021/06/5881/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2021/06/5881/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alan McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Coutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Meffley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county administrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Schneckenburger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danielle hornberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director of administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heather O'Rourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Downs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance of effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wicomico county]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=5881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEWS ANALYSIS “And it’s one, two, three strikes you’re out, at the Old Ball Game.” The Cecil County Council stepped up to the legislative plate against the Hornberger administration this week but struck out, after some verbal swings at bat, on three major issues: the secret installation of a member of the Ethics Commission after the Council had turned down her nomination; a bond bill giving the county executive unilateral fiscal powers that the Council rejected last fall; and a sudden $2.1 million raid on reserve funds for schools spending just weeks after the county executive claimed she wouldn’t raid the reserves in her new budget. On the bonds and reserve funds measures, the administration of County Executive Danielle Hornberger (but not Hornberger herself, who personally stayed far away from the fray) had the Council over a fiscal barrel by claiming the county would suffer fiscal harm if her demands were not met immediately—a loss of possible revenues from re-financing bonds at potentially lower interest rates, and an unforeseen (at least by this administration) need to come up with more money to comply with state schools funding requirements. Unlike Hornberger’s administration, county officials in Wicomico and Howard counties revised their [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2021/06/5881/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cecil County Council Punts, So Far, on Budget; No Public Sessions Before 6/4 Vote</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2019/05/cecil-county-council-punts-so-far-on-budget-no-public-sessions-before-74-vote/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2019/05/cecil-county-council-punts-so-far-on-budget-no-public-sessions-before-74-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alan McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambulance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Coutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Meffley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil County council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[councilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[countuy government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director of finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal 2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Patchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackie Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Saxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volunteer fire companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worksession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=5485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEWS ANALYSIS In less than an hour on Tuesday (5/28/2019), the County Council reviewed the complex Fiscal 2020 budget proposed by the County Executive, with few questions, no spending cut proposals and just one advocate of raiding “fund balance” reserve accounts to lower the property tax rate by slightly over a penny—a move that would contradict the executive’s avowed pledge to avoid deficit spending. But there were indications that a majority of the Council seems satisfied with County Executive Alan McCarthy’s policy to wait until revenues are firmly in hand before allocating spending for certain projects, with the Council given authority to review and OK projects as the budget year goes on. As in past years, the Council held department-by-department meetings with county department heads to review their spending plans for the past month. But unlike past years’ end-stage budget actions when the Council considered spending cuts and votes by members during a worksession, this time Council President Bob Meffley (R-1) gaveled the session to a close without entertaining any amendments or votes. Instead, he said, Council members would talk among themselves in the next few days and the next step would be “the vote” on the final budget scheduled [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2019/05/cecil-county-council-punts-so-far-on-budget-no-public-sessions-before-74-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>County Council Frets on Bond Rating, Sewage Fees; Compromise to OK Exec&#8217;s Fee Boosts for 2 Years</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2018/08/cecil-county-council-frets-on-bond-rating-sewage-fees-compromise-to-ok-execs-modest-fee-boosts-for-two-years/</link>
		<comments>https://ceciltimes.com/2018/08/cecil-county-council-frets-on-bond-rating-sewage-fees-compromise-to-ok-execs-modest-fee-boosts-for-two-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 00:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Schwerzler]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alan McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cecil county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecil Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elkton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Meffley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bond rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[councilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewer fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=5354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cecil County Council heard a strong pitch from an outside expert on the county’s bond rating on Tuesday (8/21/2018) to demonstrate fiscal responsibility on the county’s sewage funds, which have been running a deficit for years. In response, Council members indicated support for a compromise to give the county executive his request for the first two years of a fee boost plan but defer action on a larger, later fee increase. The bottom line of the proposed compromise is that sewage user fees would have a small, pennies-per-day increase for the next year and a half, while putting the “enterprise funds” on a path toward self-sufficiency. But the deal would put off the political pain of a real deficit-reduction plan until after the next local election, or until the local economy has a major boost in economic development. Cecil County Executive Alan McCarthy had proposed a three-year plan to put the county’s sewage treatment “enterprise funds” on a path toward fiscal balance, by having users of the services pay most of the costs. Currently, all county taxpayers&#8211; including the majority who do not use sewage services—pay as much as $3.2 million a year to subsidize sewer customers who are [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://ceciltimes.com/2018/08/cecil-county-council-frets-on-bond-rating-sewage-fees-compromise-to-ok-execs-modest-fee-boosts-for-two-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
