<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cecil County Animal Control Group Admits Secrecy on Fatal Attack, Claims Big Taxpayer Costs for Day of Care; State Probe Continues</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ceciltimes.com/2014/02/cecil-county-animal-control-group-claims-oversight-on-secrfecy-of-fatal-dog-attack-claims-big-taxpayer-costs-for-a-day-of-care-state-probe-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2014/02/cecil-county-animal-control-group-claims-oversight-on-secrfecy-of-fatal-dog-attack-claims-big-taxpayer-costs-for-a-day-of-care-state-probe-continues/</link>
	<description>News and Views for Cecil County and the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politics for Dummies</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2014/02/cecil-county-animal-control-group-claims-oversight-on-secrfecy-of-fatal-dog-attack-claims-big-taxpayer-costs-for-a-day-of-care-state-probe-continues/#comment-28236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Politics for Dummies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3643#comment-28236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think BFL (*Bullies* For Life) ought to be deemed inherently dangerous to Cecil County taxpayers.  Remove several key players from that group and you will see the walls crash down all around them.

The SPCA was totally justified in withdrawing their proposal based on the Three Stooges behind closed doors, eleventh hour deals.  Allowing someone with a personal agenda to re-write animal laws but not making her adhere to the same is not only unethical ...but unlawful. 

Having toured both facilities, the SPCA trumps the current Buddy group, and their rented place, for professionalism, cleanliness, adherence to (and understanding of) animal laws/rights and the ability to manage animal control.  CCACC/ABFL are way out of their league.  They need to stick to rescue and leave Animal Control to the professionals! 

It would be money better spent to turn Animal Contro law enforcement over to the Sheriff&#039;s Office at this point.  And turn the care of the animals, and adoption and foster procedures, over to the animal care professionals at the SPCA.

 I believe this contract is going to repeatedly rear its ugly head and &quot;bite&quot; some politicians during the next elections.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think BFL (*Bullies* For Life) ought to be deemed inherently dangerous to Cecil County taxpayers.  Remove several key players from that group and you will see the walls crash down all around them.</p>
<p>The SPCA was totally justified in withdrawing their proposal based on the Three Stooges behind closed doors, eleventh hour deals.  Allowing someone with a personal agenda to re-write animal laws but not making her adhere to the same is not only unethical &#8230;but unlawful. </p>
<p>Having toured both facilities, the SPCA trumps the current Buddy group, and their rented place, for professionalism, cleanliness, adherence to (and understanding of) animal laws/rights and the ability to manage animal control.  CCACC/ABFL are way out of their league.  They need to stick to rescue and leave Animal Control to the professionals! </p>
<p>It would be money better spent to turn Animal Contro law enforcement over to the Sheriff&#8217;s Office at this point.  And turn the care of the animals, and adoption and foster procedures, over to the animal care professionals at the SPCA.</p>
<p> I believe this contract is going to repeatedly rear its ugly head and &#8220;bite&#8221; some politicians during the next elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeannette H</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2014/02/cecil-county-animal-control-group-claims-oversight-on-secrfecy-of-fatal-dog-attack-claims-big-taxpayer-costs-for-a-day-of-care-state-probe-continues/#comment-28172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeannette H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3643#comment-28172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you remember, the SPCA pulled their RFP because of the backdoor deals that were going on with the 3 amigos and Wein. I have to give the SPCA credit, they have kept their doors open even without the county contract but I bet given the opportunity, with an even playing field, they would reconsider.  Contrary to the Buddy cronies complaints, the SPCA was well equipped and did a really good job and they have a nice facility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you remember, the SPCA pulled their RFP because of the backdoor deals that were going on with the 3 amigos and Wein. I have to give the SPCA credit, they have kept their doors open even without the county contract but I bet given the opportunity, with an even playing field, they would reconsider.  Contrary to the Buddy cronies complaints, the SPCA was well equipped and did a really good job and they have a nice facility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ann W</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2014/02/cecil-county-animal-control-group-claims-oversight-on-secrfecy-of-fatal-dog-attack-claims-big-taxpayer-costs-for-a-day-of-care-state-probe-continues/#comment-27982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Ann W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3643#comment-27982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I am asking  - and it&#039;s a legitimate question. Remember there was only one other organization that submitted a proposal for the job - the former SPCA - who then withdrew their proposal before the contract was awarded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I am asking  &#8211; and it&#8217;s a legitimate question. Remember there was only one other organization that submitted a proposal for the job &#8211; the former SPCA &#8211; who then withdrew their proposal before the contract was awarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
