<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cecil County Council Discusses Gunfire Limits, After Child&#8217;s Death from Stray &#8220;Celebratory&#8221; Shot</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/cecil-county-council-discusses-gunfire-limits-in-aftermath-of-childs-death-from-stray-celebratory-shot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/cecil-county-council-discusses-gunfire-limits-in-aftermath-of-childs-death-from-stray-celebratory-shot/</link>
	<description>News and Views for Cecil County and the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/cecil-county-council-discusses-gunfire-limits-in-aftermath-of-childs-death-from-stray-celebratory-shot/#comment-19830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3226#comment-19830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This proposal could be simplified by passing an ordinance which simply states &quot;no projectile can leave the property of the person firing it or persons authorized to shoot on said property unless adjoining property owners have authorized such&quot; (this is so if you are hunting with permission of two adjoining property owners there will be no violation). 

As proposed here there are two many openings for interpretation by anti-gun DAs and politicians! Any proposal should be vetted with the NRA, hunting groups and other gun rights groups. We do not want to follow the lead of the liberals in MD, CT, NY and CO that passed knee jerk gun laws which hurt law abiding citizens!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This proposal could be simplified by passing an ordinance which simply states &#8220;no projectile can leave the property of the person firing it or persons authorized to shoot on said property unless adjoining property owners have authorized such&#8221; (this is so if you are hunting with permission of two adjoining property owners there will be no violation). </p>
<p>As proposed here there are two many openings for interpretation by anti-gun DAs and politicians! Any proposal should be vetted with the NRA, hunting groups and other gun rights groups. We do not want to follow the lead of the liberals in MD, CT, NY and CO that passed knee jerk gun laws which hurt law abiding citizens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Emmerich</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/cecil-county-council-discusses-gunfire-limits-in-aftermath-of-childs-death-from-stray-celebratory-shot/#comment-19806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Emmerich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3226#comment-19806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Alan McCarthy and Council members,

I think Mrs. Bowlsbey is right-- firearm education is better than more regulations. Laws are not going to stop some guy who’s been drinking from shooting a firearm in the air on July 4th or New Years. I know the death of that little girl is tragic, but you’re falling into the same trap that Owe Malley led us into. 

The problem I see as a new gun owner is there’s no place locally that teaches gun safety. The only gun ranges that have instruction are 35 miles away in either direction. 

The volunteer fire companies in this county are complaining of a lack of volunteers and funding. Why don’t the Volunteer fire companies in this county offer firearm safety instruction? They could have classroom instruction at a firehouse and maybe they could work a deal with DNR to have live fire training at the range in Northeast. The fire companies could get some extra income and use the onsite training to recruit new members. 

I didn’t want to be long winded here so if you would like to discuss this further call me. Remember that punishing the responsible gun owner won’t stop this kind of thing from happening.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Alan McCarthy and Council members,</p>
<p>I think Mrs. Bowlsbey is right&#8211; firearm education is better than more regulations. Laws are not going to stop some guy who’s been drinking from shooting a firearm in the air on July 4th or New Years. I know the death of that little girl is tragic, but you’re falling into the same trap that Owe Malley led us into. </p>
<p>The problem I see as a new gun owner is there’s no place locally that teaches gun safety. The only gun ranges that have instruction are 35 miles away in either direction. </p>
<p>The volunteer fire companies in this county are complaining of a lack of volunteers and funding. Why don’t the Volunteer fire companies in this county offer firearm safety instruction? They could have classroom instruction at a firehouse and maybe they could work a deal with DNR to have live fire training at the range in Northeast. The fire companies could get some extra income and use the onsite training to recruit new members. </p>
<p>I didn’t want to be long winded here so if you would like to discuss this further call me. Remember that punishing the responsible gun owner won’t stop this kind of thing from happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Lobos</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/cecil-county-council-discusses-gunfire-limits-in-aftermath-of-childs-death-from-stray-celebratory-shot/#comment-19805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Lobos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3226#comment-19805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that Councilman Alan McCarthy&#039;s proposed legislation was just common sense.  The &#039;Campaign for Liberty&#039; group has over analyzed this bill and has read into it much that is not there.  C4L is out of line. 

 There is nothing in this bill that is restrictive to people with common sense.  I support Alan McCarthy on this bill and stress that all liberty-minded people out there should do the same. It&#039;s just the right thing to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Councilman Alan McCarthy&#8217;s proposed legislation was just common sense.  The &#8216;Campaign for Liberty&#8217; group has over analyzed this bill and has read into it much that is not there.  C4L is out of line. </p>
<p> There is nothing in this bill that is restrictive to people with common sense.  I support Alan McCarthy on this bill and stress that all liberty-minded people out there should do the same. It&#8217;s just the right thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
