<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cecil County Council: Sewer Solstice, Deja vu Do-overs; DPW Chief, Broomell Encore Past Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/</link>
	<description>News and Views for Cecil County and the Eastern Shore of Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/#comment-20913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3269#comment-20913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I guess Councilwomen Diana Broomell was right to question the membrane technology proposed to be used at Seneca Point, after learning what has happened in Perryville. That would be grand, we pay 30 million extra for a system that does not work and then we pollute the bay and get big fines from the state. Now, will the &quot;Free Spending Three&quot; continue down a questionable path or will they sit down and think this whole thing out like we elected them to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess Councilwomen Diana Broomell was right to question the membrane technology proposed to be used at Seneca Point, after learning what has happened in Perryville. That would be grand, we pay 30 million extra for a system that does not work and then we pollute the bay and get big fines from the state. Now, will the &#8220;Free Spending Three&#8221; continue down a questionable path or will they sit down and think this whole thing out like we elected them to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/#comment-20633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 17:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3269#comment-20633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is much confusion in this article and in some of the responses; there are difference between &quot;hook-up fee/major facility fee&quot; and user’s fees and project cost. As someone who has gone through this twice, please let me shed some light on the matter. 

Hook-up fees are supposed to be used to cover the cost of future capacity expansion that the new user is now using with his new service. Service fees are to cover the cost of treating the wastewater which leaves your house. Project cost are cost which are attributable to a specific project, for example the Port Deposit interceptor. That cost should be borne out by those who benefit from that project.

 What is being attempted here is to transfer project cost and major facility cost unto the current users to benefit those who want an almost free ride with reduced hook-fees. The users will be forced in the future to pay for capacity expansion and project cost because the proper hook-up fee was not charged. 

The only reason the hook fee rates are being lowered is because special access and favors are being granted to a certain developer to avoid significant cost as their new units come on line. 

Unfortunately, it is nothing more than typical dirty politics at play in Cecil County, it works like this &quot;I give you nice big campaign donation so that you can turn around after you are elected and give me special treatment and favoritism.&quot; If you do not believe me just check the campaign donations of those now in power and it will be become very clear. This is all available on the state board of elections web site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is much confusion in this article and in some of the responses; there are difference between &#8220;hook-up fee/major facility fee&#8221; and user’s fees and project cost. As someone who has gone through this twice, please let me shed some light on the matter. </p>
<p>Hook-up fees are supposed to be used to cover the cost of future capacity expansion that the new user is now using with his new service. Service fees are to cover the cost of treating the wastewater which leaves your house. Project cost are cost which are attributable to a specific project, for example the Port Deposit interceptor. That cost should be borne out by those who benefit from that project.</p>
<p> What is being attempted here is to transfer project cost and major facility cost unto the current users to benefit those who want an almost free ride with reduced hook-fees. The users will be forced in the future to pay for capacity expansion and project cost because the proper hook-up fee was not charged. </p>
<p>The only reason the hook fee rates are being lowered is because special access and favors are being granted to a certain developer to avoid significant cost as their new units come on line. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, it is nothing more than typical dirty politics at play in Cecil County, it works like this &#8220;I give you nice big campaign donation so that you can turn around after you are elected and give me special treatment and favoritism.&#8221; If you do not believe me just check the campaign donations of those now in power and it will be become very clear. This is all available on the state board of elections web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Gregory</title>
		<link>https://ceciltimes.com/2013/07/3269/#comment-20607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackie Gregory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ceciltimes.com/?p=3269#comment-20607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many tens of millions did we lose when Commissioner Broomell sabotoged the Artesian contract?  We would be in a much better position financially in being able to make required upgrades if Broomell hadn&#039;t breached the contract -- so her statements on misrepresentation and excessive cost are drenched in hypocristy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many tens of millions did we lose when Commissioner Broomell sabotoged the Artesian contract?  We would be in a much better position financially in being able to make required upgrades if Broomell hadn&#8217;t breached the contract &#8212; so her statements on misrepresentation and excessive cost are drenched in hypocristy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
