Cecil County Commish Reject, in Secret Vote, Plan to Jumpstart New Tech School

May 31, 2012

A Cecil Times Special Report

The Cecil County Commissioners decided in a recent closed door meeting to turn down—on the usual 3-2 vote– a proposed new school of technology on the Elkton site of the vacant Basell property that already has science labs and could be bought and renovated for about one-third the cost of past plans to build a tech school from scratch.

The proposal would have jumpstarted the long delayed plans by the school system to upgrade vocational and technical education opportunities for high school students in Cecil County. And it could have been a cost-saving, landmark opportunity for the county to create an education/technology/business park on the 91-acre site that could be a lure for economic development and partnerships with other business and educational institutions.

For several months, the County Commissioners and representatives of the School Board and Cecil County Public Schools officials have been meeting privately to discuss the opportunity to acquire the property. (The state Open Meetings law allows closed sessions to discuss real estate acquisitions.) Cecil Times has known from the outset about the proposed project and its location but refrained from publishing details, at the request of multiple sources, due to the sensitive nature of the negotiations and assurances that both sides were working together in a positive manner on the proposal

However, in a brief notation on commissioner meeting minutes made available this week, it was stated that during a 5/15/12 closed session, there was a “consensus of the Board” to “advise the Board of Education and Public Schools via a letter that the Board has decided to discontinue discussions relating to the subject property for a technical high school.”

According to multiple sources, the “consensus” was actually the usual 3-2 tally, with the “Three Amigos’’—Commissioners James Mullin (R-1), Diana Broomell (R-4) and Michael Dunn (R-3) — opposing the plan while Commissioners Tari Moore (R-2) and Robert Hodge (R-5) supported it.

But the closed-door discussions leading up to the secret decision also meant that parents, students, and local business leaders who have long advocated improved technical education, were kept in the dark and unable to speak out to support the proposal.

County education officials and school board members were devastated by the Commissioners’ decision.

“In our view, when making decisions of this import, prudence must be balanced with wisdom. In this case, the adage ‘penny wise and pound foolish’ applies,” wrote Dr. D’Ette Devine, the Superintendent of Schools, in a 5/23/12 letter to the county Commissioners obtained by Cecil Times.

“To say that we are deeply concerned about the commissioners’ failure to take advantage of such a tremendous opportunity, which would address the needs of secondary career and technical education for Cecil County students, is an understatement,” she wrote. The Basell property was “an ideal solution” and “exceptionally affordable,” she added.

William Manlove, a former County Commissioner and current school board member, said it was “totally inexcusable” for the commissioners to turn their back on a plan that had “unlimited possibilities” but limited costs.

Currently, the county only offers vocational and technical training on a part-time basis to juniors and seniors at county high schools. The existing tech school, near Cecil College in North East, has limited facilities and has been determined to be unsuitable for expansion or overhaul to accommodate more students or new programs. Currently, 150 students are on waiting lists to get into tech programs, according to schools officials, but many of them may graduate from their regular high school without ever getting the tech training they seek.

For many years, proposals for a comprehensive, four-year tech school have been on the back burner, carried over in capital improvement plans of both the school system and the county government but never brought to the forefront because costs to build a school from scratch were deemed too high—as much as $61.7 million. [UPDATE: That figure did not include land costs since the school was proposed to be built on land the county already owned, next to the old school.]

Although the state pays much of the construction costs of schools, land costs are paid locally and the past cost projections figured the county would have to come up with $32.8 million while the state would pay an estimated $28.9 million, according to Tom Kappra, chief financial officer for the county schools.

But in recent years, the anticipated enrollment to justify a comprehensive, four year school—and the full allocation of state aid—has not materialized. “There was a lot of uncertainty on the BRAC impact,” said Lauren Camphausen, president of the county’s elected school board. “We were told there would be an onslaught of students coming to the county,” she said, because of military families and contractors relocating to the area due to expansion of the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Harford County under the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process.

When that influx didn’t happen, school officials began re-thinking their tech school plans and considering keeping a part-time program but still looking at replacing the current facility in North East with a new building that could accommodate more students, new programs and changing technology. (The old tech building would be used for maintenance equipment and operations that are now scattered among several sites, including leased buildings, Camphausen said.)

Suddenly, a golden opportunity appeared a few months ago: the Basell property on Appleton Road, with 91 acres of land and an existing, vacant two-story building with more than 158,000 square feet of space, including 18,750 square feet of laboratory space, according to its listing on the county’s economic development office website. The property has been vacant for many years, since Basell North America relocated.

The property had been priced out of reach but a price reduction made the facility much more attractive as a potential school site. An asking price of $6.5 million was discussed, according to multiple sources who spoke on condition of anonymity, and a potential sub-sale of 10 acres to a third party for about $1 million could have brought the costs of acquisition by the county down to about $5.5 million.

Commissioner Moore said she toured the facility and it “didn’t seem to need a lot of renovation.” The building was in good condition but would need to be re-configured and modified to meet the needs of a school. School officials estimated that renovation and related costs would be about $9.9 million, for a total cost of $16.4 million. Of that amount, state officials indicated a willingness to provide $4 million, Kappra said.

Consequently, the proposal meant county costs of $12.4 million—or $11.4 million if the possible 10 acre sell-off came through. Contrast that amount to the projected $32.8 million estimated county costs for building a new school from scratch—and that is why school officials and some County Commissioners were excited at the potential of the Basell site.

Commissioner Hodge said the project offered the possibility of multiple uses of the site, including the tech school, expanded recreational and sports fields under the county’s Parks and Recreation programs, and attracting business to a potential education/business complex where companies could help train their future workforce in the skills they need for their operations.

“I thought it was a good idea, and a great opportunity,” Hodge told Cecil Times. But other commissioners were concerned with the costs. “But if this isn’t the most cost-effective solution, I don’t know what is,” he added.

Moore said she supported the project as cost-efficient and felt it made sense both from an education and economic development standpoint. “I think education IS economic development,” she said. She felt there could also have been partnerships with industry that could have reduced costs further while providing additional educational opportunities for students.

The property is located near the Gore facility and a short distance from the new proposed University of Delaware high tech business complex, and some local school officials said partnerships with those operations could have been worked out.

Commissioner Broomell was said to have been concerned with the costs of the project and the timing, as the county still faces an uncertain economic future and the state is slated to continue to shift greater costs for teacher pensions onto the county next year. Cecil Times has called her for comment and will update this report upon her response.

The stumbling block of costs cited by some commissioners comes as the county has just put a wide range of construction projects on hold, in order to cut a half-cent off the previously proposed property tax rate in the recently adopted county budget for Fiscal 2013.

One of the points of contention is that land purchases cannot use county bond funds, Kappra noted. So the county would have to come up with the money from its “fund balance” or other sources to buy the property, but construction/renovation costs could be financed through capital construction bonds.

So about $6.5 million (or $5.5 million, if some acreage were sold off to a third party) could have been drawn from “fund balances” or unallocated money held in reserve by the county for contingencies. The commissioners were willing to spend $3 million of fund balances to pay annual operating expenses in their new budget but at the last minute trimmed their reliance on the fund to about $660,000 after delaying a number of road projects.

In contrast, the Basell property purchase would be a long term asset, with potential offsets of the costs through grants such as for parkland development on the site or sale of other acreage to businesses.

Sources said some county staff were cool to the project because of a reluctance to tap the reserved funds which total some $30 million overall but provide a healthy cushion for future budgets and contingencies. And some felt the Basell property should stay on the property tax rolls as an income source for county coffers, rather than converting it to a tax exempt, public use facility.

Camphausen said she and other school board members felt they presented a “good faith proposal” that was “extremely well-vetted.” The board is “extremely disappointed with the decision,” she said. But, trying to keep an optimistic view, she added, “the door is never shut” and the project might re-surface in the future.

Dr. Devine told Cecil Times the schools were “between a rock and a hard place,” trying to conduct private negotiations so as to get the best possible price from the seller, win over the county Commissioners, and win support from state school officials—all while not being able to enlist public support from business, parents and students who support votech programs.

State school construction officials toured the Basell site and “blessed” the project enthusiastically, she said. And the labs at the site already have equipment the county schools “could only dream about,” she added.

Now, “We’re sort of stymied,” Dr. Devine said. “This was an affordable option to meet a critical need,” she said. The need still exists but the solution is nowhere in sight.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses to Cecil County Commish Reject, in Secret Vote, Plan to Jumpstart New Tech School

  1. Broomless on June 1, 2012 at 9:08 am

    More lack of vision on the part of the 3 Amigos. I would rather pay higher taxes than lose this opportunity. But they would rather short change county students than provide for future job growth. They continue to be brainwashed by Smigiel and Pipkin into believing that voters care only about tiny tax cuts. Broomell and Dunn need to join Mullin on the REJECT list.

  2. Patrick Tuer on June 1, 2012 at 3:08 pm

    Thankfully, Mullin will be done in November, and Dunn and Broomell will be done in 2 years.

    • 1Citizen on June 3, 2012 at 12:22 pm

      Mr. Tuer,

      Even if you are correct, the Smipkins won’t just give up; they’re grooming many candidates so it may be that most of the candidates in the 2014 Republican primaries are Smipkinites. That’s why it’s important to gain control of the County Council this year by keeping Tari Moore where she is and electing Pam Howard as County Exec.

      Given the Smipkins’ control of the Republican Central Committee, it’s a certainty they’d take the opportunity to replace Tari with one of their own.

      • Real GOP on June 4, 2012 at 7:08 am

        The County Exec can veto poor Council “legislation” and four votes are required to override. Adding another Smipkin does not accomplish Smigiel/Pipkin contol. Tari has the best experience for the job. Elect her in November and replace Broomell and Dunn in two years. With the Smipkin self-inflicted damage during the past two “3 Amigo” years and their disgusting attacks on political opponents in the last election, the “Friends of EJ Pipkin” team lost.

        • wendy wintersgill on July 7, 2012 at 4:50 pm

          All good advice. Elect Moore and wait as the others are self-impairing. However, our CCPS students need expanded technology education now.

          Anyone in our community with suggestions to obtain the Bassell property, please notify the BOE!

          Thank you.

      • Just a chimp on June 5, 2012 at 6:16 am

        Here it is again. This is the Smipkin Theory they love putting forth so much. They paint pictures in an effort to distort the facts. As we get closer to November, these theories will hit your mailbox and your phone as slick glossy expensive mailers and expensive robocalls.

  3. RUkidding on June 1, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    One word: Unbelievable!

  4. Doug Donley on June 4, 2012 at 10:33 am

    “…uncertain future.”? I think the 150 students on the current waiting list could explain what that means.

  5. Anne Thomas on June 20, 2012 at 9:48 am

    Boy, doesn’t that just tell all. No money for school, no money for bridge–both for the citizens of this county. BUT, money for land none of us can use FOREVER!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Fine Maryland Wines
Proudly made in Cecil County