Chamber Forum: Commissioner Candidates Speak, Show Pictures

October 4, 2010

The Cecil County Chamber of Commerce hosted a softball candidates’ forum Tuesday night, with candidates for County Commissioner getting a chance to pitch their biographies and platforms without questions on issues. If pictures are worth a thousand words (or the four minutes of talk alloted to each speaker), then incumbent Commissioner Brian Lockhart (D-3) took the cake with his slide-show of ribbon cuttings for new or expanded businesses opened in the county on his watch.

Lockhart, the current President of the county board, highlighted his participation in ribbon-cutting ceremonies for multiple businesses opened in the county since he won his seat in the 2006 election. What he didn’t say was that some of the businesses had been courted by the county long before he took office. However, he particularly mentioned the Monday “soft opening,” as the owners call it, of the new Hollywood Casino in Perryville, the state’s first slots facility. That project, the result of a state-wide referendum on slots two years ago, did receive substantial support from the county on expedited permits and inspections that led to the early opening of a facility that has already created over 300 jobs. The facility’s Penn National operators have said that most of the jobs have gone to Cecil and Harford county residents.

Lockhart. who owns two trash removal companies and is a board member of Cecil Bank, said he went to the Monday “soft” opening of the slots facility and was pleased to meet so many Cecil County residents who have found jobs close to home. “It came at a great time,” he said of the revenues that the slots facility will bring to the county. He cited his experience as a small business owner to illustrate his commitment to support existing business in the county. “It makes me mad,” he said, when people only talk about incentives for new businesses. “We need to help the businesses already here,” he said, adding that he endorses a “buy local” agenda.

His opponent, Michael Dunn (R) said the county “needs fresh ideas on the Board of Commissioners” and cited his “experience” working for Del. Michael Smigiel (R-36) as a legislative aide. He said he had worked with his family in the hospitality industry. Dunn said his agenda was “lower taxes, less government spending” and “jobs” in the county. He said he had been active with community and Republican groups for over ten years and noted he had served a term on the county’s Republican Central Committee.

“We need to adopt a new path,” Dunn said. He said the county must “eliminate waste” in spending and “lower taxes.”

In the 4th District Commissioners race, Democrat Carl Roberts, who defeated incumbent Commissioner Wayne Tome in the recent Democratic primary, highlighted his “executive experience” as the former county Superintendent of Schools and cited his resume for bringing “effective leadership” to county government. Roberts emphasized his campaign theme that the county is too reliant on residential property taxes–constituting 61 percent of the revenues used to support county government costs– and he urged business expansion to “re-balance” the revenue funding mechanisms of county government.

Roberts mentioned the concerns of county voters he has met, using their first names, and how he would address their issues. Among them are concerns by farmers that they have been ignored since there are now no farmers on the county board. “Agriculture is the single biggest business” in the county, he said, and farmland constitutes the largest land use. He pledged to listen to and address the concerns of the farm community.

His Republican rival, Diana Broomell, cited her “grassroots background” as a GOP activist and land preservation advocate. “I’m a hard worker,” she said, citing her involvement with the 21st Century Republican Club and efforts to bring about an elected county school board.

Broomell obliquely criticized Roberts, saying that a former Schools Superintendent testified in Annapolis for a ‘special taxing district’ bill that did not provide for “school funding provisions.” ( At the time that legislation was pending in Annapolis, Broomell was employed as a legislative aide to Del. Smigiel, who strongly opposed the legislation, which was nevertheless enacted by the General Assembly.) That legislative authority, which has yet to be used by Cecil County Commissioners, allows assessments of fees against developers whose projects would cost the county for additional services required by their projects.

In the 2nd District Commissioners’ race, Democrat Earl Piner, Sr., a longtime Elkton town commissioner and former school board member, said his most important qualification for the Commissioner seat was his personal “integrity” and his dedication to listening to the community. He cited his many family members, all graduates of county schools, as proof that he would listen to parents and educators to ensure the schools have the support they need.

Piner said he would bring the concerns of local residents to the Commissioners’ Board: “I want your input so I can bring it to the table,” he said.

His GOP opponent, Tari Moore, said she and Piner had agreed to wage a positive campaign. But most of her presentation sounded like past Carl Roberts candidate appearances that focused on the need for a “strategic plan” for the county. (During the Tuesday forum, Roberts only briefly mentioned needs for a ‘strategic plan.’) Moore cited her experience as former executive director for the county’s Chamber of Commerce and said she knew how to help bring business to the county. She said her top priority was to bring “infrastructure” to the county’s growth corridor between I95 and Route 40.

[Cecil Times will file a separate report on the Chamber of Commerce candidates’ forum for state candidates for Delegate and state Senate.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to Chamber Forum: Commissioner Candidates Speak, Show Pictures

  1. Jacque Broomell on October 4, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    I can’t help but notice that the writer has written positively and in a good light regarding the Democratic candidates for Commissioner but the Republican candidates…not so much. I was at the forum and heard all candidates and am ready to wholeheartedly support both Diana Broomell and Tari Moore for county commissioner. They both have extensive business experience and share a concern for Cecil’s future and citizen’s. And by the way, just because Diana Broomell was employed by Delegate Smigiel does not in any mean she always agreed with him. Diana is her own person and rightfully so.

  2. Diana Broomell on October 4, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    Just to clarify: When I went to Annapolis to testify, I was not employed as a Legislative Aide and had resigned from my position in January of 2007. I would have testified in opposition as a private citizen if given the opportunity but the session was closed with no public comment but Carl’s statement was read by our State Delegation. When I asked Carl why he would support this legislation as a Superintendent he said it was a misunderstanding and that he was submitting as a private citizen. However, his title of Superintendent and the Booth Street address were on the testimony and the Ways and Means Committee were led to believe the schools were in support by his testimony. I remember that one of the members of the Ways and Means Committee questioned why he would support because the schools would not receive any funding. I called school board members after the meeting and they confirmed that Carl was not acting on the Board’s behalf. I still have a copy of his testimony if any one is interested.

    • Cecil Times on October 4, 2010 at 1:48 pm

      Diana, thanks for clarifying the time frame of the testimony you were referring to. The County Commissioners and the state delegation have been fighting over impact fees, special taxing districts and related issues since at least 2005.

      Whatever you call it, the commissioners have been trying to find a way to make developers pay at least some of the costs for the infrastructure their new projects will require– roads, water, schools, etc.– rather than foist the costs on longtime residents.

      If we understand your comments correctly, your objection was not to the concept of such fees but to the lack of provisions specifically pertaining to school costs, which of course are one of the largest financial burdens accompanying new residential development.

  3. Richard Sawyer on October 4, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    Thank you for your reporting of last night’s Chamber candidate forum. I was present for both the Commissioner’s portion as well as the Maryland Delegate/Senator speeches. It’s a shame more people were not present in the audience to hear the candidates speak.

    I found your recollection of the Commission candidate’s speeches accurate, except for one. “Most” of Tari Moore’s presentation spoke to the importance of getting infrastructure in the growth corridor – I only heard her mention a strategic plan in reference of her plan of how to accomplish that goal. The comparison of her points to “past Carl Roberts candidate appearances” does not give her the credit that is due. Moore has been on the campaign trail and has talked about the importance of a strategic plan long before Carl Roberts even filed for office.

    Point of clarification. In the 2008 Special Taxing District legislation (HB 1562) it specifically itemizes “schools” and “educational facilities” as something that can be paid for by revenue created from a special taxing district. I’m not challenging Ms (Diana) Broomell’s memory on the question by the member of the Ways and Means Committee…however, the Committee member’s statement was not correct.

    Please keep up the great work you do in your research of important issues and in keeping residents informed with insightful information – it is greatly appreciated.

    • Diana Broomell on October 4, 2010 at 1:54 pm

      Yes, it “allows for” but doesn’t require.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Fine Maryland Wines
Proudly made in Cecil County